Friday, July 29, 2016

Remember the 80's?

Because I certainly do!

And you know what I remember the most?!?!

There were a bunch of ass-clowns walking around talking about how great the 50's were!
Now that it's 30 years after the 80's, there are all these ass-hats talking about how great the 80's were!

It makes me wonder if - during the 50's - there were all these douche-bags talking about how great the 20's were...

Any decade where there are not massive orgies, world peace, sex for men whenever they want, and a perpetual army of young big boobed hotties constantly stroking my giant penis is a bad decade.
Allow me to rephrase that.

I am from the 80's.  There was nothing special about it (except maybe some of the music).  In fact, I'd have to say this - I do not know any MAN who was "successful" with women.  All the MEN I know who got married are now divorced - after dealing with a psycho-bitch for at least 5 years.  The other men I know who are single (myself included) are extremely weary of women.

Now, let's talk about the 50's (again, good music - splish splash I was taking a bath, lollipop etc...).  I have met people from this generation.  There are two types of women I have encountered.  Type 1 - divorced their husbands once the pill came out - and went off acting like sluts.  Type 2 - made some poor schmuck live in celibacy or got cheated on and bitched about it endlessly.

Either way, the 50's sucked, the 80's sucked, and the "2010's" will also suck.  30 years from now, people will be like "OH MY GOSH!  REMEMBER THE 2010'S!?!?"

If I am still alive, I will say, "yeah - they sucked - and so do you."

Why would I do this?  Because that is the kind of cheerful person I am.  They should be glad that I do not say something really mean...

Friday, July 22, 2016

Politics Getting Ugly.

Well, according to the lame-stream media, Donald Trump supporters are being attacked - yes - physically.

I wondered if this is a trend in politics in general - so I did some google searches to see if supporters of ANY candidate are being attacked as frequently...

Clinton supporters attacked

Trump supporters attacked

Disgusting isn't it?

Now, I have not met anybody supporting Hillary Clinton. If I did, I certainly would not initiate physical violence against them.

I have met some people that supported Bernie Sanders. I found them to be logical and rational people.

Notice from the search engine results above, that some Bernie Sanders supporters have been attacked as well.

It needs to be stated here very clearly - Donald Trump supporters are being attacked the most.


The seriously bizarre thing about this, is that anti-Trump protestors are carrying signs saying that "Trump is Hate".

This might seem like a HUGE leap of logic to some people, but I think that "Anti-Trump Protestors ARE HATE".

So - let me get this straight. You beat up Donald Trump supporters, then claim that Donald Trump is hate???


Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Enron - Wait - What!?!?

What exactly is Enron responsible for? We have all heard of Enron's financial corruption and misleading of investors (i.e. banks). But what else might they responsible for?

Enron BareBones:

Enron was formed in 1985 by Kenneth Lay after merging Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth. Several years later, when Jeffrey Skilling was hired, he developed a staff of executives that, by the use of accounting loopholes, special purpose entities, and poor financial reporting, were able to hide billions of dollars in debt from failed deals and projects. Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow and other executives not only misled Enron's board of directors and audit committee on high-risk accounting practices, but also pressured Andersen to ignore the issues.

The Enron scandal, revealed in October 2001, eventually led to the bankruptcy of the Enron Corporation, an American energy company based in Houston, Texas, and the de facto dissolution of Arthur Andersen, which was one of the five largest audit and accountancy partnerships in the world. In addition to being the largest bankruptcy reorganization in American history at that time, Enron was cited as the biggest audit failure.

Bored yet? Scroll to the bottom if you are...

I was very eager to learn more about Enron. I did the usual internet searches. Wikipedia seemed to be a good source of information. But; how much does WikiPedia reveal? How accurate is it? I have no idea of course...

A non-biased investigation needs to occur.

For that to happen, politics MUST be thrown out the window. The documentary Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room is an EPIC FAIL. That documentary starts out with sickeningly thick liberal bias by talking about George W. Bush. Love Bush, or hate Bush, it is a fact that Enron was exposed and crushed while the Bush administration was in power. The documentary later talks about Governor Schwartzenegger - something that made me laugh out loud - because I was fully aware that Governor Schwartzenegger did not come into office until 2003 - two years after the fall of Enron. And of course, no shit documentary would be complete without some conspiracy theories thrown in - it seemed to suggest that the 9-11-2001 attacks were "engineered" to take attention off of the Enron scandal. BUNK!

During the course of my investigation, I came across a very disturbing piece of information.

30,000 people had filed lawsuits against Enron. The lawsuits totaled 40 billion dollars. Holy SHIT! That's a lot of lettuce (that's street talk for cash...).

What became of these lawsuits? They were filed in 2001 or 2002... Where did they go?

It appears that it was quite a fight. Many banks were involved.

In January 2008, the Supreme Court tried to reject the lawsuits.

On September 9th 2008, some of the lawsuits (7.2 billion) went through.

What happened 1 week later...

On September 16, 2008, failures of massive financial institutions in the United States, due primarily to exposure of securities of packaged Subprime lending subprime loans and credit default swaps issued to insure these loans and their issuers, rapidly devolved into a global crisis resulting in a number of bank failures in Europe and sharp reductions in the value of stocks and commodities worldwide.

So - was that a mere coincidence?

Is it possible that the lawsuits against Enron and the banks that invested in Enron going through popped the "housing bubble"? Was there even a "housing bubble" to begin with? Could the entire crash of 2008 be attributed to Enron?

How is it possible to take billions of dollars from the economy and not suffer consequences - long term consequences?

Monday, July 11, 2016

Congradulations MEDIA, on Starting a RACE WAR.

Fuck it. I originally had a post written up about how the media has started a race war, and how nearly impossible it is to get consistent information on how many blacks/whites/hispanics/asians etc... are killed by the police each year - but I figured what is needed here, is some of my seriously bad taste humor.

A picture is worth a thousand words, so I am going to start this post by showing you some images I found while trying to determine how many WHITE MEN are killed by the police each year (are more whites killed by the police each year????)

This graph needs some explaining: As you can see, blacks start out stealing things at a young age, so the police shoot them. Whites do not get into manufacturing METH until they are in their late 20's, early 30's - once they finally STOP having sex with their cousins/farm animals - and the Mexicans - well, they are too busy picking cherries which makes it hard for the police to shoot them. The mexicans really need to get out of the cherry orchards, and out into open view so the police can shoot them more readily. Asians are not included in this study, because they do not matter - just like the Arabs.

This is another shocking graph, as you can see, mexicans are yellow, whites are an ochre color, while blacks are a dark blue. If you see anybody of these colors, and you are a law enforcement offical - shoot them immediately. Asians are not included in this graph, because as we all know, Asians do not matter - just like the Arabs.

With this graph, we've taken into account Asians, and OH YEAH - Native Americans. As is clear, Asians and Native Americans do not matter. That is what this graph proves. Mexicans are clearly too busy picking cherries to really make a contribution to this race-war. Asians are too busy playing with calculators and Native Americans are too busy doing rain dances. DAMN YOU ASIANS AND NATIVE AMERICANS!!!

Oh yeah - ARABS and PERSIANS too! Honest.

This blurb presented by FOX is the best. It shows Blacks and Whites, but completely ignores the other races - like Asians who are too busy eating Sushi and using Chopsticks to really matter. The blurb above by FOX also ignores Native Americans, Arabs, Persians etc... JUST AS IT SHOULD!

The above blurb presented by FOX does not mention anything about those cherry-picking Mexicans. SHAME ON YOU FOX FOR IGNORING THE CHERRY PICKING MEXICANS.

These images are from the lame-stream-media, so yes - the idea is to bombard you with a slew of mixed messages.

Confused? I am. But thankfully, I have a mind, so I am capable of rationalizing.

Here is a much better image that I made, which should clear things up:
Dallas Shooting
Dallas Shooting

Anyway MEDIA PEOPLE - congratulations on starting a race war! My guess is - your ratings are higher than ever! I can't wait to hear how Donald Trump is actually responsible for all of this!

I hope you all get shot by some of the people you have enraged so much with your biased and warped views of the world.

I apologize to Mexicans Hispanics for this post...

I forgot to mention that the Mexicans are also stealing everybody's jobs - when they are not busy cleaning pools.

Thursday, July 7, 2016

Donald Trump - I'd Really Like to Hear Your Thoughts

This post is dedicated to ERIC - shout if you are still around bro - we are all worried...

So, I am seeing a lot of "left-wing-apologists" in the man-o-sphere bashing Donald Trump.  The strange thing - I have seen terms like "libtard" and some others here and there.  It appears that there are new terms for right-wingers in the man-o-sphere - "cuckservatives" and whatnot.

I read Dalrock's latest post about how the alleged new VP for Donald Trump (Joni Ernst) liked to cut off pig's balls.

The thing that struck me as strange - the post started off talking about how it was "rumored" that Joni Ernst was going to be Donald Trump's running mate.

Rumored - isn't it also rumored that 1 in 4 women will be raped in college?

It struck me as more odd, how Dalrock's article cited many trash online news outlets (lame stream media) - like: People, Daily Mail and the Washington Post.  All reliable sources to be sure - NOT - it seems that Jodi Ernst was never actually a consideration after all - according to the same news sources.

I am confused here.  I understand that the right side of government is not that much better than the left when it comes to supporting men - no scratch that - when it comes to a blind insane hatred of men and male HETEROsexuality.

But seriously - the alternative (as I see it), is to vote for Hillary Clinton - a ball busting feminazi psycho bitch from hell if there ever was one.

So - why do some people insist on pointing out all of Donald Trump's flaws - while completely ignoring what the alternative is (i.e. Hillary Clinton)?

In fact, I would not even call it pointing out flaws - it is a simple mimicry of trash articles from the lame-stream-media (left wing it seems too) trying to make Donald Trump "guilty by association" with a lesbian hag.

When I read Dalrock's post, I was shocked at the YouTube videos, and shocked that Donald Trump was "considering" Joni Ernst for a V.P. candidate.  But then I looked at the stories that Dalrock linked to - allegedly, maybe, rumored etc...  All the usual bullshit - no substance - was he really considering this bitch for a V.P. candidate - or was it all the lame-stream-media's way of trying to drag Donald Trump through the mud?

Is this how desperate left-winger's have become?  The left-wingers in the man-o-sphere resort to taking the lame-stream-media seriously???

Also, why is it - that when man-o-spherians hear things like "1 in 4 women will be raped" - they scold it.  BUT - when they hear that MUSLIMS are doing it - it is frighteningly REAL - and not fabricated at all?

This post was my attempt to poke fun at how the articles about the Cologne incident NEVER sited an ACTUAL RAPE. The usual "tales of horror and rape" seemed feminist in nature - and were simply part of feminist propaganda.  When I dug through those stories, the only rape I saw was, "one report represents a rape" - inconclusive to be sure...

Another thing that bothered me about Dalrock's post - do conservatives really like a ball chopping feminist?  Can anybody provide references that demonstrate this?  Please keep in mind - any references must point out that conservatives and conservatives alone like a ball-chopping feminist.

This is one thing that has always bothered me about the man-o-sphere - they say that various news sources in the lame-stream-media are pure garbage - but use those to enforce a political agenda - usually left-wing.

Why is that?

And, I make no apologies in advance - simple name-calling responses will be deleted.

Be civilized and intelligent in your response - I would really like to learn something here other than what an asshole left-wingers are (I already know that) .

Anyhoo -enjoy looking at a picture of a woman who: thinks she is too good for you, thinks she is too good to talk to you, would laugh if you got your penis cut off, laughs at men getting raped, screams bloody murder when a woman gets raped,  would happily spend all of your hard-earned money on shoes and not give a shit if it ended up in your house being foreclosed on, would happily and gleefully do her best to crush your spirit by being excessively rude if you spoke to her
What's not to like about her?!?!

Remember - we live in a misogynistic culture...