Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Horrors of College - Part I

Just something I whipped up - I actually started this one a long time 2012.  Got around to digging through my old files and finished it - FINALLY...

I plan to make a series of these...

Friday, September 25, 2015

Toy Vacuum Sends Wrong Message to Middle Aged Man Shopping at WalGreens

They look like fun and non-menacing toys poised like vacuums. But are they in fact, sending the wrong message to middle-aged men like Richard from Reno Nevada when he shops at Walgreens? We sent our crack-head team of reportive investigators as well as our Prozac-ridden team of instigative reporters to investigate and report on these so-called "toys".

Lame-Stream Media
When 45 year old Richard from Reno NV first saw the inconspicuous toy sitting on a shelf he thought nothing of it. But after he stared at it for a few minutes, he realized that the toy vacuum box was telling him that children should be vacuuming his house.

Our crack-head team of investigating journalists investigated and journalized all about this bitch. They talked to the middle-aged Richard for 15 seconds, then smoked some more crack. This is what Richard allegedly had to say.
I saw some children on the box, and realized that the toy vacuum box was telling me that children are superior at vacuuming than adults. Now, every time I vacuum, - I feel inferior or that I am doing it wrong. I just want to give up on vacuuming altogether.

Lame-Stream Media
Our crack-head team of investigators then investigated feminist opinions all about this bitch. The seriously evil toy vacuum box is clearly one of the many ills in our society that just sends wrong messages to people like Richard.

feminist I think the person who made this toy vacuum box should be drawn and quartered. In addition to sending the wrong message to middle-aged men like Richard, it also sends the message that boys are better at operating equipment like vacuum cleaners - and that is damaging to women - that is why I do not have a billion dollars - it is all because of this damned toy vacuum box.

feminist I think the people that made this toy vacuum box should be stuffed into a cannon and then shot at a brick wall - that'll show 'em!!!

feminist I think the makers of this toy vacuum box should be placed into the Iron Maiden. Then they will stop sending the wrong message to middle-aged men like Richard - who is clearly a victim of the toy vacuum cleaner.

As the middle-aged Richard was leaving the Walgreens, the cashier made the grim mistake of saying "totally" way to much.

Richard then looked at the young female cashier and said, "TOTALLY? You know that I am like TOTALLY going to give you a hard time about that now..."

The young female cashier giggled (in order to cover up her sheer terror and fear of the misogynistic and creepy middle-aged Richard) and said, "OH, I am like so TOTALLY a valley girl".

The creepy Richard then responded back, "I am like TOTALLY going to pay cash for this purchase, and like TOTALLY get a pack of gum too."

Lame-Stream Media
Richard went on to excessively use the word "totally" way too much while speaking to the beautiful and sexy young female cashier whom he TOTALLY wanted to FACE-SLAP with his GIGANTIC PENIS.

Yes, he was clearly flirting with her - and this team of anti-depressant-smelling reporters has no choice but to blame the toy vacuum box for his pedophilic tendencies for flirting with a 20-something young woman. AND THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM BEING JEALOUS - GOT IT!!! If the toy vacuum box did not exist - Richard would probably be TOTALLY gay - which is like TOTALLY OK.
Totally Bangable
Luckily, the young woman was TOTALLY not raped or beaten by Richard, but she was TOTALLY psychologically traumatized after TOTALLY speaking with the TOTALLY middle-aged Richard - all TOTALLY because of that damned toy vacuum box.

Damn You All to Hell

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Men with their Arms around their Female Partners is Sexist Claims Ugly Smelly Disgusting Angry Old Carpet Munching Hag

So, Helen Mirren claims that a photo with a man having his LOVING arms around his female partner is sexist.
Helen Mirren
Helen Mirren

Yup, the veteran venereal-diseased skank is claiming that a man with his arms around a woman is actually - EEEEEK - sexist because it "implies" ownership!


I guess that in order to avoid being a sexist pig, you can no longer put your arms around a woman anymore.


Anyway, the article I link to is quite revealing, the matured muff diver Helen Mirren claims that if she were to give her younger self advice, she would tell people to "f**k off" more.

Helen Mirren
Helen Mirren

I guess this means that she banged a lot of losers when she was young and hot - er - uhm - I mean young and f**king ugly.
Helen Mirren
Helen Mirren

Anyway, Helen Mirren the tired old tit-sucker is clearly one of those women who was "young and stupid" at one point.

Now that she is 70, it appears that the not young nincompoop is old and stupid...

Helen Mirren is a Senior Master of Stupid, and a closet Geriatric G.I.Jane Chaser.

I would like to follow her advice and tell her to F**K OFF
Helen Mirren
Helen Mirren

Anyway, for those of you interested, there is a survey you can take to express your disgust with Helen Mirren - and what she said.

At the time I wrote this, a whopping 8% of people agreed with what the usless wrinkly old smelly vaginal infection had to say.

Feminism is oh so popular isn't it?

Why does the lame-stream-media keep on putting offensive women in the spotlight again and again and again...???

Helen Mirren
Helen Mirren

Join me next time for "100 Uses for Helen Mirren's Dead Body"...

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Perjury in Family Court

Well, I have actually experienced this in person recently. It did not affect me as much as it affects some people - but I did experience it in July.

Funny too - the attorney for the perjurer said, "If you don't like it, take it up with the district attorney" with a very smug attitude.

Here is what I found out about perjury in FAMILY COURTS in NEVADA:

the Nevada Supreme Court noted that "It is uniformly held that the giving of false testimony is not civilly actionable." Thus, a party injured by perjured testimony cannot bring a civil action against the opposing party or a witness who has offered perjured testimony, even if the perjury has affected the final judgment in the case.

I can dumb this down for anybody not understanding it - it says this, "People can lie their asses off in family court, without ANY repercussions WHATSOEVER - PERIOD".
Harry Reid
Anybody in these circles knows that the most common perjury committed in family court is, "He was abusing me" or "He was abusing the children". This is done so that a woman can get full custody of children (hey - they need somebody smaller to vent their frustrations out on...).

Yes, in NEVADA, a woman can LIE openly in court, or in a sworn statement - and suffer NO REPERCUSSIONS WHATSOEVER - PERIOD.

The motivation for lying is of course - sole custody of the children, or money - quite a motivation to lie - and there will be NO CONSEQUENCES IF SHE IS CAUGHT.

Anyway, I provide some links for reading, and highlight the text that is interesting in them now.

You'll discover that no one in the family law system cares about lies

The following letter by Chief Justice Stuart with copies to Judge Macrum and Judge Fasing explains why a judge in any civil court can't rule on Perjury. After you have downloaded a copy of Judge Stuart's letter you have to understand there is no record of any District Attorney prosecuting anyone for Perjury in a Civil court in the State of Colorado. (NOR OTHER STATES)

It is almost a certainty that the local prosecutor will not file criminal charges alleging perjury against your ex.

So are there penalties for perjury in family law cases in Virginia? The bottom line is that perjury is rarely, if ever, prosecuted in a Virginia family law case.

For starters, their failure to punish perjury results in massive increases in court hearings. It also results in far more complicated cases in which innocent parties who are being truthful are abused by lying litigants with the assistance of incompetent judges. And all of this adds up to spiraling legal costs which often don't end until after all of the marital assets are depleted.

Exceptions to the perjury laws can be found in family courtrooms everyday, all across our country. Often judges, prosecutors and lawyers can barely contain their laughter, judges can be seen snickering from the bench as they listen to blatant lies by attorneys, questionable statements made under oath, and read written declarations of multiple scenarios each signed under penalty of perjury, all to explain away any charge of domestic violence, child sexual abuse or family terrorism.

In reality, every case is riddled with lies, half truths, shades of fact and the greatest of all, the omission of a critical fact that totally changes the situation.

What happens, however, when a witness swears to "tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" and then lies? Unfortunately, despite the fact that perjured testimony is offered everyday in our family courts, not much happens to the lying litigant. Not only does the opposing party have limited civil remedies available to "right the wrong," but history and the current policy of the Clark County District Attorney s Office tells us that the perjurer will not be criminally prosecuted. Moreover, our family court judges appear to be hesitant to exercise their contempt powers to put an end to the prevalence of perjury.

Unfortunately, one of the most common places you might experience perjury is during family law proceedings. People routinely mischaracterize their income, events that might affect child support or alimony, the location and value of assets that should be distributed between the parties, etc. Of course, this is also one of the settings where perjury can often be the most difficult to prove and is rarely enforced because it is often difficult to prove. Nevertheless, if you can provide irrefutable evidence that someone has lied under oath, you may have the right to ask that the person be held in contempt for perjury and/or you or the judge might notify the local criminal prosecutor of the event.

Note that the above article does not mention the most popular lie - false domestic abuse claims from women.

Anyway, I was shocked that people can lie so much in family court. Dang - I mean - I have been to court many times, and one thing I know - NEVER LIE.

It appears that family court - the rules are radically different - lying is perfectly acceptable.

Now, there are court appointed people who handle family specific court proceedings - but those people are mostly in charge of children's rights...

Nobody is around to handle the lying psycho bitch saying that her husband beats or molests the children - hence - women lie in family court all the time - WITH ABSOLUTE IMPUNITY.
Divorce Court
So - the $64,000 question is this - how do I get laws passed so that people who lie in family court are in fact - persecuted?

I think that in terms of anti-feminism - and men's rights - this should be a "first step". Does anybody disagree? If so - PLEASE state why...

One place that feminists get their statistics about "domestic abuse" (be it children or women) is from the family courts - and how often it is "alleged"...

What would happen if women lying about either spousal abuse or child abuse were charged with perjury (a 5-year sentence in these parts)...

Seriously - what would happen?

Am I the first person to discover this? It occurs to me - that we could monitor all divorce proceedings carefully - and watch for perjury - then report the judge as one of the articles above suggests...

Anybody have any ideas on how to stop all the lying in Family Courts? Specifically Divorce Court?