Let’s start by pointing out the obvious – this week near Reno, is burning man
That said – let’s head back to “femiservatives”.
Now, as I understand it, a femiservative is basically a post-feminist woman who enjoys all of the liberations that radical feminism ALLEGEDLY provided, whilst pretending to oppose feminism at all turns, and of course, a member of the conservative party.
Yeah – that is a confusing definition. Lets look it up on google shall we? (only 5 pages of results – many just comments – some of them my comments)
From Robert Lindsay (quote in faggot pink)
Femiservatives are basically conservative feminists or conservatives who do the feminists’ bidding for them. For instance, around 1920, a femiservative outfit called the Women’s Temperance Union put into place California’s age of consent laws, putting them at 18, which was very high for the time in an era when many females were marrying at 14 or 15. This same WTU was also responsible for the atrocity of Prohibition.
Interesting quote – but to start, he mis-named the group – the group was in fact called Women’s CHRISTIAN Temperance Union or wCtu
It was in fact a CHRISTIAN group, not a conservative group – nice try. So, a CHRISTIAN group made the age of consent 18. I wonder – where in the Bible does it say, “Thou Shall Not Have Sex with a Woman Under the Age of 18!” – Is that the 12th commandment? I am pretty sure that the Bible says NO SUCH THING. If that is correct – why would a CHRISTIAN group be so adamant to make the age of consent for SEX 18? I ask - any Christians reading this? What if I want a 17 year old to be the mother of my children - am I committing a sin?
Remember - priests porking altar boys in the a** disapprove of you looking at this 17 year old.
And the kicker - that "age of consent" does NOT include the altar boys getting f**ked in the a**.
Anyway - that was 1920? Anything newer?
Some “femiservatives” want to ban porn – just as the radical feminists did:
femiservative Dr. Laura Schlessinger published a similar manual titled ‘The Proper Care and Feeeding of Husbands.’ The title alone sounds like a Department of Agriculture brochure on raising livestock. But that’s how women view all men (as pigs).
Quote from Wikipedia in faggot pink.
In 1998, Schlessinger was in a Costa Mesa surf shop with her son when she began perusing the skateboarding magazine, Big Brother. On her radio program, Schlessinger declared the magazine to be "stealth pornography." When the owner of the store publicly denied that she found pornography in his store, Schlessinger sued him for lying, claiming that his denial had hurt her reputation. When the case went to court, the judge dismissed her suit, but the shop owner's $4 million defamation countersuit lodged for hurting the reputation of his store was allowed to stand. The suit has since been settled, but the terms of the settlement have not been revealed.
Sounds like Andrea Dworkin – “stealth pornography” – WTF!!! The odd thing is that Laura Schlessinger practices Judaism – I suspect that her “insane rage” against porn stems from that – not being a conservative.
One incident that makes me weary of the term “femiservative”…
I remember how the hard-core-left-wing feminazi’s attacked Sarah Palin
That link above is one modest example.
I did not wonder for one second why there was so much hatred for Sarah Palin – I never wonder why there is hatred when feminists are involved – after all, feminism is a HATE MOVEMENT.
But, researching Sarah Palin, I cannot really find anything on her (except for hearsay from various man-o-sphere blogs) about what a man-hater she is… Anybody care to contribute? (I was particularly disappointed with intellectual powerhouse "FidelBogen" who called her a "bimbo" and an "airhead" I believe - just basic name-calling - no intellectual protein).
I did hear ONE intelligent argument against Sarah Palin from a conservative – something about seeming different at first – but then just re-instigating America’s War Machine (something along those lines – I cannot quite remember). Thus far – no intelligent arguments against her from the man-o-sphere that I have seen.
Let’s look at another "femiservative" group
Well, why would any church group want to close a strip club? How many women in that church group? How many are conservative? How many are doing so because they detest male sexuality?
No leads to support any theories. But again, this is not a conservative group – this is a CHURCH group.
Hmmm. Well, it seems that there are female conservatives that have similar agendas to Andrea Dworkin (I pick the worst case feminist here for demonstration).
They want to ban porn – why? Do they do that out of a hatred of male sexuality? Or – are men in fact – the “victims” of pornography since pornography largely targets men (something akin to drug dealing only to one demographic?)
I would conclude (from some very flimsy evidence on the internets) that “femiservatives” are real – but very rare.
In fact, I’d say they are rare enough to also suggest that the term is coined by misguided left-wing MRAs/MGTOWs or whatever in order to preserve their political beliefs.
I would also say that ALL POLITICAL PARTIES have FAILED MEN miserably.
Now, I apologize to anybody that I offended by pointing out the ties to anti-male-sexuality and organized religious groups – but that does seem to be one tie – the political party has nothing to do with it.
Where in the Bible does it say something like, “Thou Shall not offer silver nor gold to see a woman’s breasts”???
How about the Qur’an?
How about the Torah?
One thing that I find curious – specifically when it comes to questioning people’s beliefs…
And let me clarify – I do not “question” their beliefs – I respect their beliefs – I simply want an explanation or an answer – give me a Bible verse – or a Torah verse – or a Qur’an verse – that says clearly in an unambiguous way – that not only are YOU NOT supposed to do "THAT Thing" – but you are also supposed to STOP EVERYBODY ELSE from doing "THAT Thing" too.
Sorry for the rant – here is the summary.
Femiservatives are extremely rare it seems. I would “guess” that it is a desperate attempt from some misguided left-wing MRA’s to salvage the trash heap that is the left wing of government.
When femiservatives do exist, it seems to stem from their religious beliefs, not from their political party – AND – as Dr. Rookh Kshatriya pointed out briefly (and I ineptly tried to point out) – those beliefs are not actually listed in the BOOKS (do not appear in actual scripture) that found their religion. It is just crap that people made up.
Please - share your thoughts - as I mentioned, there is little evidence for me to really get a solid conclusion going here - any and all input is welcome - comments containing racial slurs will be deleted.