This documentary was so awesome, I had my pants off in the first five minutes!!! When my wife got home, boy was she angry, but when she started watching it, her pants came right off too!!! It was definitely a night to remember. Thank You Sarah Palin. Be sure to send the kids to bed before watching this!
Of course, I am not married - I just threw that in there for additional humor...
That comment originally got a 4 out of 5 members found this review helpful (most likely funny) - when I checked over the weekend, it had been flagged too many times as "inappropriate" - and hence removed.
Some people have no sense of humor at all.
I'll have to dig through those pictures, and find out which ones were "copy written".
I doubt that any of them were - more likely, some angry snit falsely reported it to blogger...
FYI - here is the E-mail I received...
Blogger has been notified, according to the terms of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA),
that certain content in your blog is alleged to infringe upon the
copyrights of others. As a result, we have reset the post(s) to
\"draft\" status. (If we did not do so, we would be subject to a claim
of copyright infringement,
regardless of its merits. The URL(s) of the allegedly infringing
post(s) may be found at the end of this message.) This means your post -
and any images, links or other content - is not gone. You may edit the
post to remove the offending content and republish, at which point the
post in question will be visible to your readers again.
notice that we received, with any personally identifying information
removed, will be posted online by a service called Chilling Effects at http://www.chillingeffects.org.
We do this in accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
(DMCA). You can search for the DMCA notice associated with the removal
of your content by going to the Chilling Effects search page at http://www.chillingeffects.org/search.cgi, and entering in the URL of the blog post that was removed.
it is brought to our attention that you have republished the post
without removing the content/link in question, then we will delete your
post and count it as a violation on your account. Repeated violations to
our Terms of Service may result in further remedial action taken
against your Blogger account including deleting your blog and/or
terminating your account. DMCA notices concerning content on your blog
may also result in action taken against any associated AdSense accounts.
If you have legal questions about this notification, you should retain
your own legal counsel.
But, back to the documentary, I thought it was well done, but it had a liberal tint on it. It painted conservatives as siding with big business, and liberals as siding with human beings. Each politician is unique, the letter of the alphabet next to their name is irrelevant to how they will act.
If anybody else has seen this, I would be interested in their thoughts on it...
Well, I have been seeing a commercial here in Reno NV on T.V. - an attorney claiming to be a men's rights attorney.
Of course, I wonder - is this woman just a carpetbagger? And yes, I know the racial association with that term - that is NOT the context I use it here. The context I use it is this - is she just capitalizing on a bad situation? Or is she sincere about her desires and fully understands how bad men and fathers have it these days when it comes to divorce?
Anyway, I have decided at this point in my life to become an official super-villain. Yes, sorry to anybody who thought I was a hero, I am not, I tinker with mad science, and other world-taking-over stuff.
Enjoy my debut:
Of course, that is not actually me (seriously, it isn't), as I would not consider getting an erection over a woman as "dis-respectful". I wonder why the writers of this sketch did...
Still, I did think that video was hilarious!
I think they should digitally remaster the old Batman T.V. series from the 1960's and have Batman and Robin with constant erections in their pants - it would make the show 10 times funnier than it already is!
I am going to submit my idea to FOX television - and see what they think...
Sometimes things do get bad. People become corrupted, or brainwashed - others are evil enough to instigate such tripe. Things do have to be done. But, there is nothing wrong with taking a five-minute (or even a two-day) break.
There are some things that cannot be changed - and guess what - they are pleasant.
The picture above was taken last night (corner of Patriot and Virginia), after I got caught up in a flash flood - no drama - I was walking my dogs (at Virginia Lake Park) - and suddenly - it was pouring rain and hail. I walked to my car with my dogs - I was soaking wet, as were my dogs - I drove around in the chaos until it subsided...Then snapped the picture above.
It is Friday - go enjoy a beer, a martini, a margarita, pepsi, coke, or whatever.
Watch some T.V. Stare at the wall mindlessly. Play a video game.
Take a breather.
Oh yeah - try really hard to not rape any women every 5 seconds - or engage in that sex-trafficking or slip those date rape drugs into any woman's drink...!
I thought, f**k it, why bother – it took way too long to explain, and I try to keep my posts short.
However; I will mention this part...
Paul mentions David Futrelle – and how David Futrelle would be “getting more sex” if he looked more like Hugo Schwyzer (less ugly/fat – whatever).
How does Paul Elam know how much sex David Futrelle is getting?
Is how much sex Futrelle gets in anyway pertinent here?
And, gee, according to things I have read by Paul, it sounds like you will NOT get sex if you act like Hugo or David – in fact, according to many man-o-spherians – you get the exact opposite – less sex.
Anyhoo – I decided to write the skinny about what won’t be said about Hugo Schwyzer (in either feminist circles or the man-o-sphere).
Let’s get the obvious out of the way - which will or has been said...
Hugo Schwyzer is a little twirp. If he had any brains, he would have a degree in some hard science, and not be a “gender politician”. If he had any brains, he would not be fighting for “women’s equality”.
The people in the man-o-sphere will of course, call Hugo a White Knight or a Mangina – or whatever other terms they have invented.
What I have never understood clearly is this – how come the MRM/MGTOW and others do not make up terms for women who create men like Hugo?
Do they even ponder the concept that perhaps this man was molded from feminist clay?
Instead of creating more terms to bash men – like White Knight and Mangina – why not make up terms for women?
A Mangina is a man who “tells a woman what he thinks she wants to hear”.
A White Knight is a man who defends a woman/women – regardless of their character – HE does so simply because she is a woman/are women.
Why are there no female-equivalent terms in the man-o-sphere?
How about a term for a woman who raises a son to be like Hugo – or David?
How about a term for a woman who sides with a woman’s issues without really pondering the social outcomes of such an issue?
How about a term for a woman who only hooks up with guys that are hypocritical or pretend to actually care about women’s issues – when in fact, all they care about is tail?
How about a term for a woman who defends other women just because they are women?
How about those women who complain about Christianity and call it "fake", yet at the same time, they take astrology or zodiac signs as Gospel?
How about women who smoke pot, yet berate people who smoke cigarettes - claiming they are destroying their bodies - or destroying the ozone layer?
Think about all the women out there who need to be berated...especially in this day and age...
This is just one thing that disturbs me about the MRM – the article at AVFM was no exception. They make new male-bashing and new male-shaming terms – yet – these terms in themselves relieve women of accountability and responsibility – suggesting that various types of men are the cause of toxic women – and not the women themselves.
Is it not even remotely possible that Hugo is simply the product of feminism and not the cause of it?
He is a man, and therefore, he MUST be blamed.
As for the women who molded him – who cares – they are little sweet peaches...
Why so many PUA's and other's in the manosphere often push for marriage at such a young age...
When I say young, I am referring to late teens, or early twenties.
I apologize, and yes, this is just my small circle of the world - but all the marriages I have seen at that young of an age always end bitterly - as do all the marriages I have seen - ever.
I have seen all my friends that got married to women in the late teens and twenties go through the hell of a bitter angry witch yelling and screaming at them later in life. What's worse - they literally have to start all over in their mid twenties or thirties in order to regain any kind of savings. The ones that had kids with the woman they married so young - never acquire any savings at all - that is, they never recover financially.
The best deal for a man is to NOT get married.
I will make no apologies for sounding like a broken record player. Marriage is a contract with the United States government involving your relationship with a woman. If any woman or church leader says that you are living in sin, or they want "the real thing" - ask them, "from a religious stand-point, I would be happy to marry - why do we need to have the government get involved?"
Watch the responses you get to that one...
Church leaders are oblivious to what marriage actually is - they are seriously deluded enough to call a contract with our government "holy".
Many women are also stupid enough to associate a government contract with love.
In either case, you are dealing with people who do not understand what marriage is.
If they did, they too would avoid it.
So, what makes me sick about this post - well, I am actually agreeing with something Fruitelle said.
But not entirely. Fruitelle complains about PUA's pushing to marry at a young age - I am pushing to not get married PERIOD.
Sorry for another moment of seriousness, next post, I plan to talk about the U.S. military's plans to get rid of that nasty male violence streak by replacing the standard issue assault weapons with Hello Kitty brand assault weapons - I heard that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had some things to say about it...
They wanted $259,500 for it. I said to myself, “Yeah Right!”
I bid $212,000 on a Monday morning. I gave them until Wednesday 5:00pm to think it over. I did not expect to be taken seriously. Monday at 10:00am I had an answer – YES.
This was back in May of 2009.
$47,500 LESS (nearly 20% less) then what they were asking. They accepted the bid almost immediately. I was kicking myself thinking – I probably could have gone down to $180,000 or even less.
Anyway, over the years, I zillow’ed the price of my house, at one point, it was estimated at $140,000.
Currently, it is estimated at $199,000. I owe roughly $118,000 on it. My monthly payment is $743.15.
This is what I call the secondhousing bubble – housing prices are rising again – and unrealistically.
Of course, I hear all kinds of nutty conspiracy theories about what causes the housing bubble – and there is no doubt in my mind whatsoever that there are unscrupulous real estate agents out there playing the market (as well as other people).
I would like to point out something that I have not read about anywhere...
The blatent unfairness that occurs when somebody buys a house
A buyer has 3 people and 1 institution working against them when they wish to purchase a home.
1.The seller of the house.
2.The seller’s real-estate agent.
3.The buyer’s real-estate agent.
4.The bank giving the loan.
The seller of a house wants it to sell for as high a price imaginable.
The seller’s real estate agent also wants the price to be sky high because of commission.
The buyer’s real estate agent also wants the price to be sky high because of commission.
The bank giving the loan wants the price to be sky high, because they want people to be indebted to them as much as possible.
So, remember this – when you buy a house, you have 3 people and 1 agency all working against you – they will do anything to drive the price of the house up as high as possible.
4 against 1 – no wonder housing prices always go up – the only time they go down is when all hell breaks loose.
Notice that not one single source in the lame-stream media – not one single politician has EVER pointed this out.
It is a rigged game – has nobody noticed? Or have they noticed, and simply do not care?
I'd place my money on the latter...
No anti-male-hatred talk, no funny stuff, just an observation. In my immediate neighborhood, there are 5 real estate agents that I can see from my front window...