Tuesday, April 30, 2013

And Then They F%@#KING Came For...

First, they came for the neo-cons…

I said nothing, because I am not a neo-con.

Then, they came for the so-cons…

I said nothing, because I am not a so-con.

Then, they came for the PUA’s…

I said a few things - I am not a PUA - and they are kinda easy to make fun of.

Then, they came for the “trad-cons”…

I said, “What the F$#!@% is a traditionalist, and why the F%$#@ are you appending 'con' to it?” - Especially when F%$#@KING people like F%@#KING Harry Reid – a LIBERAL support the F%@$#KING ideals you speak of?

Then some F^@$%KING crazy Asian guy accused me of F*@#$KING telling non-stop F*^@%KING racist jokes and F%@*^KING defending Zionism – so I F*^@%KING looked that up on F%@#^KING Wikipedia – and I F$%@#KING said, “OH MY F@^#%KING GOD – WHAT THE F$%*@#!!!”.

Then they F*%@#KING came for F@%#$KING Arianna Pattek

And I F@*$%KING said, “Wait a F%@#$KING second...”

Then most of them F^$@#KING called me a F$#%@KING White Knight

Then I said, “WHAT THE F$#%@#!!! – Screw It!”

I wonder who they will F%$@#KING come for next?

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Non Violent Activism

A post before I begin on my merry quest to smack my home-owner's association.

Call all your local book stores, and ask them if they carry "HAVOC" by Dr. Rookh Kshatriya.

If they say no, sound disappointed, and say something like, "Well, dang, I guess I'll have to waste time trying to figure out how to buy it on the internet."

It is easy - just open up your phone book, look up book stores - call each number and ask, "Do you carry the book HAVOC by Dr. Rookh Kshatriya?"

Call them more than once, use a different voice the second time through (if your number is blocked anyway).

Then, buy his book - here it is on Amazon, and here is it on Barnes and Noble.

What will this accomplish?

If more than one person, or several people call the same book store, all asking about the same book, the book store may decide to stock it.

People who answer the phones at the book stores may get curious about the book, and order it themselves.

More mention of the book will be made - its existence will be more known.

Best of all, no violence, no slander, no libel, no harassment, and no self emulation is required.

I have already spoken to the Reno Police department too - there have been no reports of dog attacks or dog bites in my neighborhood.

I'm am guessing that my source of somebody on the board of directors having a friend that sells dog bite liability insurance is correct.  This will only make my job easier.

In addition to that, the home-owners association is asking 500,000 dollar liability insurance be required.  So far, on the internets, I have only found insurance that goes up to 200,000 dollars - and it costs just under 200 per month.  Since I have two dogs, would I have to spend 400 dollars per month?  Just to own dogs?  And that is for a 200,000 dollar policy - how much would a 500,000 dollar policy cost.

Saturday, April 27, 2013

Screw It

Well, this has been bothering me.

When the spam post came out about Arianna Pattek, and how she was the alleged author of this blog, specifically this post came out, I was skeptical.

I did some proper investigating (or perhaps inept fumbling based on your point of view) - cut me some slack - I am not the sharpest knife in the drawer...

First, I did a google search of the blog, to see if GeorgeTown University was ever mentioned in the blog.

Second, I did a google seach for Arianna Pattek on the blog - nothing came up.

Third, I examined the Georgetown University web-site carefully, and sure enough, Arianna Pattek's name was there, but there was no indication as to what type of degree she held (the author of the blog claimed to have a PhD).

I did some other things too, but to no avail.

The skinny - I could find no concrete evidence linking her to that blog.

I warned some people about it (via E-mails), and typically I was met with some hostility.

I was called a "White Knight" - sticking up for Arianna Pattek - the grim fact was, I was watching out for some of the bloggers that I like, to make sure they were not guilty of libel.

So, in short, I was trying to watch my fellow men's backs - and I was met with hostility.

The last time I encountered an attitude like this - was when I dealt with the women I attended college with.

When I did something in their favor, I was met with hostility.  I assume it is because they thought I had "suspicious motives" or that "nice guys aren't really nice" (who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men - BAH!).  I would get accused of just wanting sex (even though often, the women were not what I would call attractive), and foul language would soon spew out of their vicious mouths.

Now, the "MRAs" (at least most of the ones I contacted) are doing the same thing to me.

Why is this?   Why do so many people assume that just because I am a man (MRA's are now OFFICIALLY included in this group as far as I am concerned) they instantly assume that all I am trying to do is get sex/defend women/vagina worship/etc...?

Woozoo is the only one who did not bomb-blast me with insults or mildly hostile tones when I told him how fishy the whole story seemed - cheers to him - and WooZoo - shoot me an E-mail if you want me to remove mention of you.

The others that I actually was concerned about - well - I got name calling, or some mild hostility.  My sincere concern was that their asses be covered against a libel lawsuit.

All I did was suggest that they sprinkle their posts with things like "allegedly" and "supposedly" - so that they are off the hook for libel. I even went so far as to write a post on this blog warning people to err on the side of caution

But, just like the rabid women I dealt with in college - they (most of the MRA's I e-mailed privately that I care about) instantly accused me of "White Knighting", sticking up for women, being a pussy etc...

Odd to say the least.

At any rate - I will no longer defend any of these people.  The title of MRA itself is a toxic one.  I have never identified with them from the get-go (read just the fifth blurb in that link), and pondering the reactions I got to my efforts to protect them from being guilty of libel - I am now certain.

It is clear to me now, that these "MRA's" are not misogynists, but men-haters.  Anything positive that a man does is taken to be something rotten and vile - jump on the bandwagon, and call him names.

This is no different than when I was in college.  You try to help, you extend an open hand - and you get a fist in the face - because you are a man...

I wonder - if Typhoid Blue or Something That Looks Like A Girl had warned them instead - would their reactions been different...

Anyway, it is doubtful that I will be posting anything for a while.  I am hiring lawyers and private investigators first thing on Monday - to sue my home-owners association - in possibly more than one way.  It appears that somebody who sells insurance has voted a new regulation that pet owners buy liability insurance in the event that their pet bites somebody...  I already have sources claiming that the person who raised this issue sells such insurance...

The only thing that evil needs to flourish is for good men to sit by and do nothing.

MRAs - say hello to evil - I am not going to care if evil flourishes in your circles anymore.

In my neighborhood - I will care - I already have 9 of my neighbors up in arms over the new pet insurance bullshit.  Those are only the people on my immediate block who own dogs.  Just imagine how many there are in the entire "community".

The little miss fascist Stepford wife who is trying to screw people out of more money is about to get a huge dose of vitamin Richard.  I know it will put a very bitter taste in her mouth, and that will make me smile. 

Anyway - enjoy your weekend all, except you MRA's.  My intuition at smelling bullshit is not going to be used for ANYBODY who puts such a label on themselves.

In your flagrant stupidity, you have turned on men, and you are now no better than your angry bitter "feminist" counterparts.

Friday, April 26, 2013

Sorry, but Who is Voting for these Clowns?

Most of "our" politicians are voting for an internet sales tax.

Here are the numbers for the final cloture vote on the National Internet Tax Mandate

YEAS - 63

Baldwin (D-WI)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Corker (R-TN)
Alexander (R-TN)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fischer (R-NE)
Graham (R-SC)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
McCain (R-AZ)
Moran (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
King (I-ME)
Sanders (I-VT)

46 Dumbocans,  15 Republicrats, and 2 Incompetents.

NAYs - 30

Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Crapo (R-ID)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Johnson (R-WI)
Kirk (R-IL)
Lee (R-UT)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rubio (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Vitter (R-LA)
Baucus (D-MT)
Merkley (D-OR)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Tester (D-MT)
Wyden (D-OR)

5 Dumbocans, 25 Republicrats, and no Incompetents.

Not Voting - 7

Boxer (D-CA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Cruz (R-TX)
Flake (R-AZ)
Portman (R-OH)
Wicker (R-MS)

2 Dumbocans, 5 Republicrats and no Incompetents.

The overwhelming majority of Dumbocans support an internet sales tax 87%.
The minority, but still a significant portion, of Republicrats support an internet sales tax - 38%.
ALL the Incompetents support the internet sales tax (Yuppers - both of 'em).

Stop and take a look - the majority of all three parties support an internet sales tax...

Where will the taxes go?

They will go to pay for all the f**kups in this world - who antagonize YOU as the "nice guy who isn't really nice" - that is where they go.

Or worse - they go into the pockets of the politicians voting for the new tax...
American Taxes
 Our new American Mascot

OK - so FESS UP - who voted for these people???

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Women's Groups Outraged at Giant Penis on Mars.

Various women's groups are protesting the fact that the new mars rover has drawn a gigantic penis on the surface of Mars.
Penis on Mars
Gigantic penis drawn on Mars just for kicks.

The women claim that the phallic symbol is degrading to women, has increased the number of rapes occurring on Mars, and martian women are now being forced into weight loss and prostitution programs - and are dying and suffering at alarming rates.  According to new studies, 1 in 3 women having sex will now burst into flames because of the penis drawn on Mars.
Women Protest Martian Penis
Women protesting the Penis on Mars

One women in the group in particular was quoted as saying, "This is the most disgusting thing I have ever seen, even more grotesque that Reese Witherspoon".  The uppity hags women's group were clearly furious over the penis, because they obviously haven't gotten any in years understand how dangerous and degrading the human penis is to women, civilization and the ozone layer too!

Steve SquiresSteve Squires was allegedly reached for a comment and supposedly said this, "Yeah, the only reason we spent billions of tax payer dollars is so that we could draw giant penises on Mars just for sh*ts and giggles.  But we also understand the seriousness of contacting Alien civilizations, and letting them know that our dicks are bigger than theirs.  This will become more and more important as we reach for the stars - with our big penises - especially if we discover intelligent female alien life forms - man - that would be cool!"

Monday, April 22, 2013

Feminism Means Equality – Now all you White Males – Get Stuffed

An excellent demonstration of feminism’s “Equality” in practice is this blog.

Specifically, this post; here is an exact quote...

For instance I can’t tell you how many applications I saw that were just dripping with white male privelege. Any of those that I saw basically went straight to the garbage can regardless of how good their qualifactions were. If I saw an application from a white male that basically was just good test scores, and activities like chess club or math club or what not then it shows me this person is not interested in a diverse environment. Obviously he made no effort in integrating with minorities or to sympathize with them and is counting on male privelege to get in. So that kind of application should get ignored. In their place I admitted a female student. This goes double especially for math/science majors.

This paragraph is an excellent demonstration of how this person is a racist and sexist bigot...

1. She is suggesting the minorities (non-whites) have no interest in chess or math clubs (racist).
2. She does not mention white females (sexist).

I guess that only "white males" - and more specifically, the ones that study the "hard sciences" are bad people.  That too is bigoted.

Whomever wrote this blog describes themselves as “secular humynist, pro-Israel, feminist, and fiscally conservative”.

Apparently, being a “humynist”, means discriminating against white males – more specifically, those that engage in school activities such as Chess Club, Math Club etc…

The more logical the man, the more of a danger he is to womyn/society…

This mentality is not just common among feminists, it is common among many women today – whether they label themselves as feminists or not.

Now, all that being said, this blog is ALLEGEDLY run by Arianna Pattek.  I smelled something fishy, when an anonymous poster pointed this story out to me.

There is no actual evidence linking Arianna Pattek to that blog.
There is also no evidence linking that blog to the Georgetown University

I hate to say this, there is evidence that Arianna Pattek did not write the blog.  That evidence is - whomever wrote the blog claims to have a PhD - Arianna only has an undergraduate degree.

There is no doubt in my mind that whomever wrote this blog is full of male hatred.  The best example is from this post...

The male sex drive is to blame for most of the world’s conflicts from football hooliganism to religious disputes and, even, world wars, according to scientists.

She gives a link as a reference to this outrageous claim, but it is broken...

Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, Condoleezza Rice - and many others - like say Cleopatra - had absolutely nothing to do with any wars...

When I went to college, this was the typical mentality I had to deal with.

White heterosexual men who study hard sciences (math, science, engineering) were vilified in the school newspaper (the publications of The Sagebrush that housed the apparent hatred have "mysteriously disappeared" from U.N.R.'s microfilm archive...).

Seriously... Am I such a bad person, simply because I was born white, straight, and I am filled with an enthusiasm for science?

There is bigotry and discrimination in our culture.  That is a fact.

I think that certain brands of it are purposely being ignored - especially by those who consider themselves as standing against it.

Now, enjoy a nice picture of Adria Richards that I made!

Adria Richards
Adria Richards' Bitchopoly

Friday, April 19, 2013

WARNING: Please Read This - Even if You Hate Me

Arianna Pattek has been buzzing around these circles lately.

I would approach the story with an ounce of caution though.

While I believe that it is true that many young women come out of schools with an indoctrination towards - men, whites, middle to upper middle class, heterosexuals etc...

I would implore everybody who gets a hold of such news to "do proper investigative journalism".

If you cannot find EXACT and CONCRETE references about a story, sprinkle the word, "ALLEGED" in your blog post.

In fact, even if you do find CONCRETE sources - it is better safe than sorry...

Sprinkle "alleged" or "supposedly" throughout your blog post.

There is no evidence linking Arianna Pattek to the blog where the author made the comments of "throwing white male applicants" into the trash...

By sprinkling your blog posts with allegedly, supposedly etc...  you are off the hook for libel.

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Gun Nuts

Ever notice how common this phrase is?

It implies that if you own a gun, you are somehow “mentally unbalanced”.
Gun Nuts
Please excuse my poor photo-shopping abilities...

Gun Nuts is a term coined by uptight ultra left-wingers that want to throw the bill or rights into the trash.  They are people who need protection from freedom - because without that protection, they would go "Nuts".

Whenever the typical gun-owner comes into mind in most people, or the lame-stream media, they think of something like this:
Left-Wing Propaganda
The term of gun ownership is often coupled with racism too (specifically, low-class white trash racism).
Left-Wing Propaganda
Notice that on the internets, we are also bombarded with images of confederate flags with some inbred redneck standing in front of them, proudly waving a gun of some kind.

Just my two cents, it is the people who are against gun ownership that should be terms “nuts”.

“Anti-Gun-Nuts” to be exact.

Illegalizing something does not make it magically disappear.

Take drugs for example (no, do not "take" them - take a look at what illegalizing them has done). There has been a “War on Drugs” for decades now – we still have overdoses, we still have drug related violence, and we still have desperate addicts – what we don’t have is the billions of tax payer dollars going to “combat” the drug problem - 76.8 billion per year to be exact.

Illegalizing guns, in my opinion, would simply take guns away from law abiding citizens. That is, it would ensure that only criminals get a hold of guns.

Anti-Gun-Nut Propaganda
People like this would still get a hold of guns - even if they were illegal...

Here is a fact for you –

How many would-be criminals are shot each year by a citizen owning a gun using it in self defense?

Take a guess first…Ponder it for a moment - take your BEST guess...

The answer is about 2.5 million a year, or 6,850 times a day...

2.5 million times a year or 6,850 times a day a citizen uses a gun to save his or her life. I bet that watching the ignorant lame-stream uptight ultra lefty media you never would have known that…

Read the link above - it may be exaggerated, but it does a complete break down of all studies done.

Instead of listening to the uptight ultra-lefty media, get the facts for yourself...

Next week, I am going to piss everybody off, and talk about Sarah Palin - just to be a DICK.

And - as anybody who understands this blog, a DICK is a good thing - a f**king awesome thing.  Best thing God ever put on a man's body.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Rehtaeh Parsons, Lizzy Seeberg, Audrey Pott, and Amanda Todd

Rehtaeh Parsons, Lizzy Seeberg, Audrie Pott, and Amanda Todd...

If what allegedly happened to these young women did in fact happen, it is tragic, disgusting, and deserves justice.


Ponder for a moment, how many young women had sex, and nothing bad happened to them – they were not raped, they were not assaulted, and they did not die.

Ponder for a moment, how many young men have died for a plethora of reasons completely unrelated to sex.

Ponder for a moment, how many young women have died for a plethora of reasons completely unrelated to sex.

If there is one thing our puritanical, medieval, lunatic-filled media loves...

OOOPS! Sorry – let me start over.

If there is one thing our progressive, enlightened, left wing media loves, it is to cast sex in a negative light.

OK MRA Dudes - try telling me that our media is run by "TradCons", "SoCons" or "NeoCons" - actually do not bother - go fuck yourselves instead - I am sick of hearing the bullsh*t about "MRA" not being political and never hearing how bad left wing politics are in the "man-o-sphere" - f**k - I am going to start calling it the "left-man-o-sphere".  I am sick of the denial that the media is run almost completely by left-wingers.  I am sick of nobody mentioning that faggots have taken over Hollywood...  Go ahead, deny political correctness, deny the left-wings involvement in the erosion of our culture.  You are only making things worse by doing so.  It is my sincere opinion, that you have completely turned on yourselves, and are now simply enforcing feminism - AVFM is the best proof of this.  I was chastised for a comment on one of Paul Elam's YouTube Videos - for complaining that men do not think with their dicks.  He said, "By living in denial, you are more dangerous than a feminist".  Andrea Dworkin's FAGGOT husband would be 100% in agreement with Paul - as he was one of the first to write an essay on how "Men Think with Their Dicks".  Get a fucking clue.  Who stole Feminism - the same people calling themselves MRA's - that is who.

Stories about a young man trying to stop gang violence make the news for a few days, while stories about young women dying because of sex get bomb-blasted in our faces again and again – day after bloody day – for months – like that of Brianna Dennison.

The medieval, puritanical lunatics enlightened, progressive left wing journalists love to cast sex in a negative light.

Never you mind the millions of people that have sex on a daily basis and enjoy it.
Never you mind the people dying daily for reasons completely unrelated to sex.

Casting sex in a negative light is part of their agenda.

This is part of the old-school feminist agenda of "sex-negativity". That is why stories about women dying after sex, domestic violence, rape, sexual harassment and other piles of crap are shown on the news day after day after bloody f**king day.

The message is a simple one...

Women - be afraid of men - this sort of thing happens all the time.

Which is complete and utter bullshit.  Four young women out of millions... I wonder if a young woman has a better chance at winning the lottery than having something like this happen to her...  Maybe even a better chance of getting struck by lightning?  Raped by a dolphin?

Friday, April 12, 2013

Message from Our Government, "Gotta Anything Else?"

So, I actually own two business licences.

One, is for my web-page, RIP-Factor.

The other, is for my oldest brother - he is experimenting with electronics.

The licenses cost me very little, since neither of the "businesses" have made me any money.

I have them, in case I do decide to sell stuff on my web-site, or my brother makes some scientific break-through (he has found a way to manufacture solar panels for very little money - an economic breakthrough).

Anyway, today, I had to meet with a representative at the Washoe County Assessor's office.

They wanted a complete list of all "company assets" for RIP-Factor and Green Energy Solutions.

I was 100% honest with them - Green Energy Solutions is simply my brother playing with scraps in his garage - I told them about the potassium hydroxide he has, and some scrap metal...

RIP-Factor is a collection of bumps on a hard-drive in California somewhere (through Yahoo).

Boy were they disappointed.

They asked me if I owned a computer.  I told them I did.  They asked me if I owned a printer.  I told them I did.  They asked me if I owned a cell phone.  I told them I did.

They started listing all those things as RIP-Factor "taxable assets".

I have never used my cell-phone for anything related to my web-site.

I have never used my printer for anything related to my web-site.  In fact, I have only used it once or twice.

I actually got ticked off at the lady asking me these questions, and started yelling, "Look, I own a whole bunch of crap - I own two TV's, a car, a stereo, a house - I do not use any of them for my business - I do not use my printer or my cell phone for my web-site - there is no reason for me to.


Yes, I was in fact yelling.

She told me to just list my computer as an asset - and its value - 250 dollars (I bought it used).

So, that means I will be taxed 4 whole whopping dollars.

I wonder - how much did it cost the taxpayer for them to call me on the phone - for them to send me the letters - for the lady to sit there and drill me with asinine questions - just to get 4 dollars.

Our government is now tripping over dollars to pick up pennies.

Truly pathetic. It is like that fat person at the restaurant, "You gonna eat that?"

I also heard that the I.R.S. does not pay for itself.  Ponder this - all those tax returns they get from Joe and Jane Schmoe who make little money - our government has to pay people to go through those tax returns - and either collect or return money.  According to people I have spoken with, that process costs more than the I.R.S. brings in from Joe and Jane Schmoe...

Think about it... Our government has become a colossal waste of time and money - devoted to taking your rights away from you - or at least - failing to enforce the laws that protect your rights...

Thursday, April 11, 2013

I Got The Tax Paying Blues…

Even though I actually get money back – some 850 dollars – I am still BLUE about paying taxes…

Why you ask? No – you didn’t ask that? Tough, I’m gonna tell you anyway.

My taxes go to pay for public schools that I have no kids to attend. People who do have kids that use those schools get “tax breaks”. That is, they pay less taxes than me – even though the taxes are aiding them and not me.

My taxes go to pay for abortions on women that I did not have relations with.

My taxes go to pay for single mothers on welfare – and their kids.  Women who have been indoctrinated to think of me (white, heterosexual, middle class logical male as "oppressive" and "privileged").

My taxes go to pay for women’s shelters for women that I am not beating - the same indoctrinated women who would not give me the time of day for 50 dollars.

My taxes go to pay for the police to hide in bushes in industrial parks on my way to work – and give “iffy wiffy” tickets to my co-workers (rolling stop, failure to signal etc…) – even though none of my co-workers have never been in an accident (P.S. I have not gotten a ticket in more than 8 years and I have been rear-ended twice and crashed into once in a parking lot - gee - the police sure are targeting the bad drivers aren't they?)…

My taxes go to fund something called the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). This prevents my mechanic from cleaning my car engine on his property – he has to take it to a “special” garage and charge more money – even though at the time of my last servicing, my car was leaking oil…
AND – when I ask the “EPA” what was sprayed in my neighborhood (protect the environment) – they will not tell me (yes, I apparently got permanently sick from an insecticide while walking my dog last year – or so the doctors speculate).

A quick aside (My mechanic, and his entire crew, as well as a customer - all had type 2 diabetes - and none of them are fat.  I have a tumor on my adrenal glad which is reeking havoc on my mental states, nervous system, and cardiac system), two women I have met recently - one had a tumor on her uterus, the other had a tumor on her pancreas - Everybody is sick - one hell of a job the EPA is doing for us all eh?  

AND - Do not get me started on the FDA (Food AND Drug Administration)...

My taxes go to bomb people living in deserts picking up sticks off of the ground. People I have never met, and have done me no wrong.

My taxes bailed out companies that have horrific business models.  Those businesses now call me like 5-10 times a week asking me for more money.

My taxes pay “turnabout clowns” like Dean Heller to constantly flip-flop on issues and eventually pass legislation to take freedoms away from me - like owning firearms.

My taxes fund Universities – that are nothing more than propaganda machines that spread hatred of people like me (white, male, heterosexual, and logical – you know – “privileged”).

The Icing on the cake – Every other week (I get paid every other week), the government takes money out of my paycheck – then – at this time of the year, I have to pay somebody to see how badly they f**ked up – and how much money they owe me – or I owe them.

Why oh why am I paying taxes to the American Government?


And guess who it is that gets to pay for all the f**k ups in this world - people like me - the very people the media, academia and the politicians all get their jollies from "casting as the devil".

As for that TRAITOR Dean Heller – I am going to start a recall tonight (if one has not already been started). I am sick of all the democans and republicrats running this country.

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

German PUA Video Proof That Game Works

Well, I found a German PUA video. I hate to say this, but it proves that "game" works.  It is in german, so if you do not speak german - that is OK - just give it a chance - you'll understand what is going on...

WARNING: This video is not for the faint-hearted - it contains pornographic material. Watch at your own risk.

Monday, April 8, 2013

Public Service Ads on Domestic Violence...

About a decade ago or so, I was driving to work, and I heard an ad on the radio that went something like this...

"If your husband or boyfriend is hitting or threatening you, you do not have to live in fear.  Call the police and they WILL take action.  Hitting or threatening is domestic violence and will not be tolerated.  Just tell the police that he has been hitting or threatening you and he will go to jail."

I thought to myself - good grief - that is going to make a lot of control freak psycho bitches call the cops over nothing - except their own ill-mannerisms and hot-headed tempers.

At this point in my life, most of my friends had hooked up with women that were violent, hot-headed, ill-mannered, or just plain psycho.

Anyway, less than a year later - in fact, If my memory serves me correctly, I heard another radio ad that had been "slightly revised" just a few months later...

"If your husband or boyfriend is hitting or threatening you, you do not have to live in fear.  Call the police and they WILL take action.  Hitting or threatening is domestic violence and will not be tolerated.  Just tell the police that he has been hitting or threatening you and he will go to jail.  If you call the police and he has not been hitting or threatening you, and you claim he has, then YOU will go to jail, because that is domestic violence too."

I chuckled a bit and thought - some rich guy must have went to jail and sued the city of Reno for false arrest.

Looking back on it now, I think I can piece together a more complete puzzle...

My initial hypothesis was correct - but - in addition to that - the more people that get arrested - the merrier - that is, the more money the state can make.

And of course, the icing on the cake - sew seeds of mistrust among men and women - and pick the easier prey - women - and tell them many lies about men - tell them often - and they will believe them.

Once the women start screwing men over (due to the constant barrage of male-hating brainwashing and a false sense of vindictiveness), men will develop a mistrust of women.

Saturday, April 6, 2013

Why I HATES That There Speculations

I was thinking this morning - yes, I am inclined to spark a few neurons every now and again.

I keep hearing talk about "alpha thugs" and whatnot, and how "women don't go for smart/nice/well-groomed/well-to-do men" - I am sure anybody reading has heard that too.

First, a quick story...  Believe it or not, it is actually relevant to this post too!!!  WHAT FUN!!!

There is a StarBucks I frequent regularly.

I met a woman at the hospital when my brother was sick.

I took her to the StarBucks with me one day.

As we left, she said, "All those women in there were totally flirting with you".

I responded, "Bullshit".

She replied, "No, I am a woman, I know when women are flirting - they were definitely flirting with you.  You are a good looking guy, you drive a zippy black sports car, you are always going places, you have a cute dog, you are outgoing blah blah blah...".

I pondered that this was some form of "game" that she was employing - i.e. "you are so good looking, all the women around you flirt with you" type of thing in order to flatter me or something.

Anyway, the next time I went to the coffee shop (I was by myself), believe it or not, all the women were asking, "Who was that woman you were with?" repeatedly...

I thought, "Why would they care, unless they were flirting with me???"  (i.e. all the sudden, I am not "available"???)

Anyway, I called the police and informed them of the unwelcome flirting from the StarBucks employees - I took pictures of all of them and posted it on twitter, facebook, myspace etc.. too, and said, "flirting with me - all I am here for is coffee - I really do not need a bunch of lustful women half my age drooling over me - that is like - oh my gosh - so unprofessional!!!!  I am not a SEX OBJECT!!!"  The police made several arrests on the grounds of sexual harassment, unwanted flirtatious follies, disorderly conduct, liking sexual intercourse, wanting to have sexual intercourse, being of a sexual nature - and I now have several lawsuits against StarBucks...


JUST KIDDING!!! - Of course I did not do that - but - I was surprised - and I now do believe that they were flirting with me.  Most of them are about half my age - I pondered the possibilities.

I have talked to all of them, and honestly, of the 7 female employees, there is really only one that I would even consider "going with" so to speak...  by "going with" I of course mean savagely penetrating every orifice on her sexy twenty something body.

This made me ejaculate SPECULATE (hence the title of this post)...

I can tell that the majority of the women there (at the coffee shop) are "toxic" and would just be trouble in my life...

Here is my speculation...

Do women go for alpha thugs and pass up nice/well-groomed/well-to-do/polite/well-raised men?


Do nice, polite, well-groomed, well-to-do men pass by most women because they are fully aware of how toxic women have become - even when they do not want to be (i.e. state enforced pimping)?  I remember in college, some men (dudes that definitely weren't me) being pursued by women and disliking it...

Hence - most women have no choice except the so called "alpha thugs" - which I refer to as "losers" not "alphas"...


Is there a combination of both going on - multiplying the problem further?  This one makes the most sense, given they way I was treated in college, and they way men like The Black Pill (HAIL MAGICAL NEGRO!) are also treated by women...

Anyway, my brain started spinning out of control and I said "f*ck it" - do not speculate - stick by my guns - which are - when you hear of men being stereotyped in a negative light - express your disliking of it...

Next post - back in the early 2000's, I heard two radio broadcasts that made me laugh - I am going to share them with you... They were public service announcements about domestic violence...  One followed the other - they were about a year apart...

Friday, April 5, 2013

The Most Wrongest Thing Ever Said

I was thinking about what Adria Richards said, "Black people CANNOT be racist against White people.  Racism is a position of the oppressor who has the power"

I'd have to say that this is one of the most wrong things ever said in human history.

1. It is racist against Caucasians.  It implies that only white people are capable of bigotry.
2. It is racist against Caucasians again - It suggests that white people are (even in modern times) oppressing blacks.
3. It is racist against African Americans - it is casting them into the role of victim.
4. It is racist against African Americans - it is suggesting that there is some sort of conspiracy among whites against them.
5. It is racist in favor of African Americans - it suggests that they are not capable of racial bigotry.
6. It is racist against Caucasians.  It suggests that they have "control" all across the nation.
7. It is racist against Caucasians.  It suggests that no matter what bigotry they endure - it is acceptable, since they have the "power".
8. It is racist in favor of African Americans - it suggests they possess some form of moral superiority that prevents them from being racist.

Well, I could go on to make many more statements about this.

The point is this.

Adria Richards is one messed up bitch.

Being in the tech field requires an analytical mind.  Many women possess that.

However; Adria Richards clearly has some severely defective circuitry upstairs.

Let's pull an Oprah on her - I'd bet that she is frustrated with the technical field because of her defective brain - it makes her perform poorly in that field.  She takes that frustration out on MEN around her, because she has been told that the reason she performs poorly in the tech field, is because of patriarchy and whatnot - instead of her own defective mind.

Anyhoo - sorry for the serious analysis.  When I get time - boy am I gonna make fun of this screwy bitch.

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Threatening Manboobz - NOT COOL

Yes, I have flung poo at Futrelle many times.
I have called him names.
I am a smart ass and consider my remarks to be "ripping", not "mean spirited".

I read his latest post, and I guess that he is receiving, or at least has received phone calls that he labels as "creepy".

I remember a long time ago, when I was posting smart-ass remarks on his blog - I did see people threatening him with rape, physical harm, and even sexual dismemberment.

It was those threats that made me rethink my stance on the MRA thing.

I cannot understand a group of people who call themselves "Men's Rights Advocates" threatening a man this way.

Just as I cannot understand how some "Anti-War Protests" often end up in violent rioting...  Ya see - a bunch of people who hate war - and want peace - want it so much - that they throw rocks at police officers, break windows, and in general - well - get rid of the "peace" in that area...  Most "peace lovers" are not "peace lovers" they are simply anarchists.  They object to war - because they object to governments enacting violence.  They should state that clearly before protesting under the guise of "peace lover".

The attitudes of many "MRA's" towards other men make me wonder what they should state clearly before raising a stink.  Especially if they are going to threaten other men with dismemberment, rape or violence...

I want to make my position on this clear - I in no way whatsoever support threats or any type of violence against David Futrelle.

I have contacted that Futrelle several times through E-mail - in order to start a civilized dialogue.  Of course, he did not respond.

Why do I want to talk (type) to him?

Well, men like him need persuading the most - through dialogue - not violence.  It is a bitch - like trying to turn Darth Vader away from the dark side of the force, but - doing the right thing is typically the hardest path to follow...

Who here supports rape?

Who here supports wife abuse?

Who here support pedophilia?

Who here supports sexual harassment?

Who here wants women to be anorexic?

Nobody - that is who.

There is a group of men who have realized that there is male-hatred in our society.  That hatred comes from false information, exaggerated statistics, and "factoids" being spread - all of which vilify men.  The hatred exists - the end result is garbage like what was seen on CBS's "The Talk".

Threatening to do violence, or actually doing violence to any man will not put an end to it.

In fact, threatening to do violence, or actually doing violence will only make it more socially acceptable to do commit violence or threats against a man.

I guess that some MRA's support rights for some men, but not all men.  As many MRA's have said about feminism and its end result - "more equal than others".

David Futrelle - if you are reading this - shoot me an E-mail - I want to talk to you. 

Or - are you afraid that I won't act like Paul Elam? No way to badmouth people who stand against the male-hatred in our society?  (FYI - I now believe that Elam does not care about male-hatred - he clearly has his own agenda irrelevant to ending male hatred - in fact, it seems like he wants more of it).

You pick your prey carefully don't you - chicken-sh*t? 

Monday, April 1, 2013

Adria Richards - I Thank You!

Ugly Woman on the Inside

I want to take a moment to thank Adria Richards. Her twitting, attitude, and basic aura encompass everything that is wrong with many women.

Adria Richards
Adria Richard's twitter above demonstrates a warped definition of racism that itself - is racist.  It implies that only Caucasian people are capable of bigotry.  That is just as absurd as suggesting that only African Americans are the only people capable of stealing, or Mexicans are the only ones capable of picking cherries, or that Jews are the only ones capable of embezzling money.

She is racist against white people.  No matter what color a person's skin color or ethnic background is, they all have the same potential to treat people like sh*t simply because of their race.

Sexism - meaning "implying domination of one sex by the other"...

Adria Richards

Adria Richard's twitter above might be mistaken labelled as "good natured fun".  I would agree if the world was not as it is today - imagine a man making a similar comment - and what Adria Richards would think of him.

Adria Richards
Adria Richards twitter above demonstrates sexism - if you define it like the feminists do, "of or relating to sex".  What would Adria Richards say about a man telling a woman to stuff her bra - that he is sexist??

So far, we have a racist and a sexist.  But let's not forget that today, women are "empowered" and "strong".  So, how does she handle two men making "inappropriate" jokes at a conference?
Adria Richards

Adria Richard's twitter above demonstrates that she is a complete chicken sh*t, and needs other people to speak for her - I feel sorry for those people - because I sure as hell would not want to speak for somebody like this.  This is not strength - this is weakness.

Crap, lets see how this "modern", "enlightened", "empowered", "strong" woman handles a different opinion than her own on twitter:
Adria Richards twitter above demonstrates that she resorts to basic name-calling.  Strong indeed (sarcasm).

In essence, Adria Richards demonstrates an overall narcissism that I have seen in many young women and older women.

I am sure that anybody reading this has seen these twitters dozens of times.  I just want to keep them here for reference.  And - I apologize, but I am too lazy to dig up the original tweet links.  I personally do not question their authenticity.

I did some background checking on Adria Richards.  I could not find out what kind of degree she has, or what schools she attended (I know that she attended some Microsoft certification training - but that is all I found out).

Anyway, for reference, to make damned sure that people know what kind of person Adria Richards is, I offer some more pictures of her twitters...

Do I hate Adria Richards?


Bigotry like hers is what I got bombarded with when I was in college - white hatred, male hatred, heterosexual hatred - and specifically hatred of straight white men in the tech field.

It is not my fault that I am fascinated with computers.

Adria Richards - if my enthusiasm pisses you off - and you feel obligated to call it "privilege"...


I got where I am today by hard work and hard studying.  The fact that rotten witches like yourself were present at my college (and in abundance) only made me devote more time to my studies - so for that, I can only say, "Thank you".

Thank you - and other man-hating sexist racist witches like you for not distracting me while I was in college - but instead - telling me to "fuck off".

Thank you -  for me not ever getting involved in a relationship (living hell) with a hateful bitch like yourself.

Thank you - for my 3.9 GPA.

Other than that...